All posts by vishesh420

Exun 2008

We got the overall First Position in Exun, 2008, organized by our own school. DPS RKPuram being the host team, handed over the trophy to the runners up, DPS Vasant Kunj.

The details of the final results are as follows:

Senior Quiz (1st position)

  1. Aditya Grover
  2. Karthikeya Asthana
  3. Vishesh Kumar

Senior Quiz (2nd position)

  1. Aditya Jain
  2. G. Siddarth
  3. Sameer Mittal

Gaming – Fifa (2nd position)

  1. Aviral Goyal

Crossword (3rd position)

  1. Aditya Jain
  2. Sameer Mittal

Programming (3rd position)

  1. Rahul Bhatnagar
  2. Sajal Jain

Junior Quiz (First Position)

  1. Aditya Grover
  2. Aditya Jain
  3. Vishesh Kumar

Junior Quiz (Second Position)

  1. Dhananjay Goel
  2. Rohan Nagpal
  3. Tanay Padhi

Surprise Event – Digital Imaging (First position)

  1. Pranav Obhrai
  2. Shubham Goel

Group Discussion (Third position)

  1. Samarth Mathur

You could get the archive of the JQ, SQ, and the crossword from here.
Also, you could check out more detailed results over here.

Jack Kilby Science and Technology Quiz 2008

The Jack Kilby Science and Technology Quiz 2008 organized by Texas Instruments was held on the 18th of October, a Saturday. 4 teams from our school participated and there were a total of approximately 260 teams participating from numerous schools, in the Air Force Auditorium, Subroto Park. One team from our school qualified for the regional finals and also became the regional winners. The team consisted of:
  • Aditya Grover – X-H
  • Vishesh Kumar – X-H

They have now been selected to participate in the National Finals to be held on the 16th of November, in Bangalore.

[Update: This might seem like we’re bragging but we couldn’t help sharing this image, uploaded on TI’s site 🙂 ]
Also, thanks a lot for the encouragements, folks. We will surely try to win the nationals too!:D

Flock 2.0 : The Inside Story

An Amazing Experience. I only tried Flock 2 Beta 3 cause I wanted to use the (unofficial) portable version from here or directly download the version I have from here. Btw , proper portable versions of the final release have also been made.

It is an amazingly functional interface where you have an in-built blog editor, and a really capable sidebar that can mark your presence on just about every networking site you may have heard of as being used by many. When you open the browser, an inevitable “My World Page” opens up in which the left column is covered by diggs, etc which are shown on your set preferences, the middle column is ur updates followed on twitter, FB, etc. The rightmost, I believe is for youtube and videos, cause right now it tells me, learn HowToFlock on YouTube. No number of Add-ons in Firefox, under those known by me can also match all those capabilities of Flock. And if you know me, you would know that it counts. ;D Lastly, you can trust it cause in essence, its yet another browser based on the fx3 architecture. Have a try. You ought to like it.

Flock 2.0 is Out

, the social web browser’s second version is out and, I quote, “ready to rock!” Flock is about a browser that makes it more convenient for social networking as “It’s all about you!”. It has also, supposedly, “finally” incorporated Mysapce in its sidebar.
I am yet to use it for the first time.
TechCrunch says, the philosophy of Flock is entirely opposite to that of chrome, where although the browsers design (the address bar etc.) is thin enough, its colours are meant to attract, and not be minimalistic. I am currently downloading it so I yet don’t know what to expect. Let’s hope for the best…
P.S.: I swear, this time, I won’t write anything bad about it even if I do find it so.

Google Chrome does NOT stand up to its hype

For one of the first times, google has done something I do not appreciate. Chrome is a tad beautiful, a tad fast, and nothing else. Google very proudly claims its new browser to be very strongly equipped, but none of it was something you could like. From the very start, google only provides a 475 kB downloader on their site. After you execute that, it takes some 15 minutes downloading stuff you don’t know what, or how much. After that, it starts installing simultaneouly, and I didn’t even notice if it gives you the option of installing in some other drive. After that installation, which relievingly is pretty fast, google chrome starts up with its milky sheen, and a dumb looking window asking you to configure the browser as you want. And guess what! The default selected search engine is WINDOWS LIVE!!! I was appalled! Then opened up the browser. The look was fine, but it opened up the Google site of chrome, which talked about its many amazing features.

  • It began with the feature which is one of the most exciting, at least to Slashdot viewers, as you can see from the comments on their posts about chrome : the tabs above the address bar (??!!??). What the heck is new in that, man! Its been there in Opera since three versions.
  • Then, we move onto the quickly accessible, recently viewed sites. Again a copy from Opera’s Speed dial.
  • Then, the easily movable and drag-out-to-create-a-new-window tabs which is too explicit a copy from Safari.
  • Then Incognito mode, copy from Safari’s private browsing and as it has been compared, to IE8’s inPrivate browsing.
  • There’s also the highly fabled about, each tab running as a different application or process preventing entire crash of the browser, which is taken from IE8, still in beta, and pretty shabbily done.

A feature, they haven’t actually called a feature, is the way selection of a text-box makes it get a golden glow on it. That too (OMG!!) is a copy of safari which gives all buttons and text-boxes a blue border glow.The only new thing must be the absence of a menu bar. There are just 2 good looking buttons, one spanner, and one New-page-type icon which hide all the rest of the stuff – which also is pretty similar to IE8 (just see the levels Google has fallen down to, to copy!). The only thing that might be new is the 1/2 a curve thing which rotates to show loading of a tab, and that’s the only thing which looks downright cheap.

All in all, switching to safari from fx was a much better experience than even trying Google Chrome (and I am still in search of the colour chrome in the entire browser, perhaps they didn’t put it to make it look even similar to safari…). I wouldn’t give it more than a two-and-a-half stars out of five and due to the hype it followed, not even coming close to matching it, I’d drop that rating down to one-and-a-half stars.